Willkommen, Gast ( Anmelden | Registrierung )
| Gast_peks_* |
10.03.2009, 15:34
Beitrag
#1
|
|
Gäste |
ZITAT Computer support forums are lighting up with queries from users wondering what to do about an alert on whether to trust a file called "PIFTS.exe". Meanwhile, someone at Symantec's support forum seems to be deleting posts from users inquiring about this alert almost as soon as they go up on the forum.Swa Frantzen, an incident handler with the SANS Internet Storm Center, writes today that PIFTS.exe appears to be related to a Norton update since it has a has a component in it that leverages the user's Internet connection to contact a Web page at norton.com, which is owned and operated by Symantec. Quellen:Also, it appears that PIFTS.exe is being submitted quite a bit to VirusTotal.com, a free service that people can use to scan suspicious files against more than three dozen different anti-virus products. ThreatExpert also has a writeup that confirms that this file phones home to Symantec. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityf...rss=securityfix http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/0...29&from=rss Mal gucken was das nun ist... Nachtrag: Anubis Analyse der Datei ThreatExpert Analyse Der Beitrag wurde von peks bearbeitet: 10.03.2009, 15:51 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Gast_peks_* |
10.03.2009, 20:21
Beitrag
#2
|
|
Gäste |
Der Vollständigkeitshalber noch dieses Update:
ZITAT Update, 2:23 p.m. ET: Dave Cole, senior director of product management at Symantec, said the PIFTS file was part of a "diagnostics patch" shipped to Norton customers on Monday evening. The purpose of the update, Cole said, was to help determine how many customers would need to be migrated to newer versions of its software as more Windows users upgrade to Windows 7. Quelle: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityf...ain_of_mys.html"We have to make sure before we migrate users to a new product that we can see what kind of load we can expect on our servers, and which customers are going to have to be moved up to the latest version of our product," Cole said. |
|
|
|
peks Symantecs Norton und PIFTS.exe 10.03.2009, 15:34
Voyager Das solche nicht hilfreichen Posts (von frisch ang... 10.03.2009, 18:59
peks Erklärt aber nicht das die ersten Posts zum Thema ... 10.03.2009, 19:36
Voyager Vermutlich meinst du das , das sieht mir aber auch... 10.03.2009, 19:50
peks ZITAT(Voyager @ 10.03.2009, 19:49) Vermut... 10.03.2009, 20:04
Rios Es spricht sich herum.
http://isc.sans.org/diary.h... 10.03.2009, 20:17
Voyager Sprich also ganz harmlos , nichts mit gehackte Sym... 10.03.2009, 20:42
dataandi Wie oft wurde schon ein Programmteil eines Antivir... 10.03.2009, 20:47
Voyager Wer behauptet noch Symantec würde irgendwelchen Hi... 11.03.2009, 02:51
peks Nur mal dieses Zitat (unüberprüft von mir) um ein ... 11.03.2009, 08:45
Paul12 Da wir hier in ein deutsches Forum sind
http://ww... 11.03.2009, 11:01
Voyager ZITATSymantec ist selbst Schuld an den Fehlinforma... 11.03.2009, 13:08
peks @Voyager
Nochmal für dich: angeblich (kann das ja ... 11.03.2009, 13:17
Voyager Tony Weiss hat selber gesagt er bedauert das das e... 11.03.2009, 13:39
Voyager Ich denke es wurde mittlerweile alles über das The... 12.03.2009, 01:22![]() ![]() |
| Vereinfachte Darstellung | Aktuelles Datum: 05.04.2026, 17:04 |